Voluntary Servitude in Digital Capitalism: A Synthesis of Frommian and Fuchsian Thought on Instagram Influencer Activities

  • Grace Heidy Jane Amanda Wattimena Universitas Sahid, Indonesia
  • Andre Ikhsano Institut Komunikasi dan Bisnis LSPR, Indonesia
  • Frengki Napitupulu Universitas Sahid, Indonesia

Abstract

The freedom of Instagram influencers within the structure of platform capitalism represents a structural contradiction that can be examined as voluntary servitude. This study aims to synthesize Erich Fromm’s critical psychology and Christian Fuchs’s political economy of digital media to explain how structural unfreedom is accepted as a form of autonomy by digital actors. This study uses a qualitative method with a literature research design through a conceptual-critical approach, without direct empirical testing of influencer subjects. The synthesis constructs a theoretical abstraction called the Dialectical Model of Freedom in Digital Capitalism. This model holds that the subject’s release from traditional authority yields negative freedom, but not necessarily positive freedom. In the context of achievement society, the post-emergence situation from primary bonds may encourage psychological escape through automaton conformity, which forms the pseudo self. This psychic submission is then converted by platform capitalism into a prosumer commodity through the mechanism of playbour. Aspirational labor, visibility labor, precarious employment, digital Taylorism, visibility game, and shadowbans show that creative autonomy is conditioned by the interests of visibility and value extraction. This study concludes that voluntary servitude should be understood as an analytical category for explaining subjective acceptance of digital exploitation structures. Its implications require digital communication studies to strengthen critical digital literacy, protect digital workers, improve transparency in algorithmic governance, and democratize platform infrastructure.

Keywords: Automaton Conformity, Influencer, Platform Capitalism, Playbour, Pseudo Self

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, C. (2016). Visibility Labour: Engaging with Influencers’ Fashion Brands and #OOTD Advertorial Campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia, 161(1), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X16665177

Almufarrida, S., & Malie, A. M. (2025). The Urgency of Legal Protection Reform for Workers’ Mental Health: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Singapore. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 853-868. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.539

Annisa, F., & Suwarto, D. H. (2023). Working with Passion: Digital Media Specialist as Precarious Worker in the Digital Age. Studies in Media and Communication, 11(7), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v11i7.6289

Asrori, S., Isma’il, M., & Gamalinda, E. F. (2025). The Flexibility Illusion: Algorithmic Control and Precarity in Indonesia’s Gig Economy. Simulacra, 8(2), 187-205. https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v8i2.30214

Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the Visibility Game: How Digital Influencers and Algorithms Negotiate Influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895-913. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818815684

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (Fourth Edition). SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DLbBDQAAQBAJ

Duffy, B. E. (2017). (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300264753

Duffy, B. E., & Meisner, C. (2023). Platform Governance at the Margins: Social Media Creators’ Experiences with Algorithmic (In)visibility. Media, Culture & Society, 45(2), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221111923

Fitria, N., Subhan, A., & Jamalullail, J. (2026). The Feminine Self-Concept of Muscular Women on the Social Media Platform Instagram. SIGn Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 443-460. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjss.v6i2.661

Fransisco, F., Nugroho, A., & Natania, E. B. R. (2025). Non-Standard Employment Relationships in the Digital Era: A Normative Study on the Regulatory Void in Protecting Ride-Hailing Drivers. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 580-597. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.503

Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from Freedom. Farrar & Rinehart, Inc. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=aw9mAAAAIAAJ

Fromm, E. (2013). Escape from Freedom. Open Road Integrated Media. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=LJiJeT7-9UUC

Fuchs, C. (2012). Dallas Smythe Today - The Audience Commodity, the Digital Labour Debate, Marxist Political Economy and Critical Theory. Prolegomena to a Digital Labour Theory of Value. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 10(2), 692-740. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v10i2.412

Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. Routledge. https://routledge.com/9780415716161

Fuchs, C. (2020). Erich Fromm and the Critical Theory of Communication. Humanity & Society, 44(3), 298-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597620930157

Fuchs, C. (2021). Social Media: A Critical Introduction (Third Edition). SAGE Publications. https://sk.sagepub.com/book/mono/social-media-3e/toc

Han, B. C. (2015). The Burnout Society (Trans. by E. Butler). Stanford University Press. https://sup.org/books/theory-and-philosophy/burnout-society

Hendra, H., Aepu, S. H. N., Kumbayoni, I., & Anjarsari, H. (2025). Jilbab: The Interplay of Ideology, Dress Code, and Consumerism. SIGn Journal of Social Science, 5(2), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjss.v5i2.415

Jin, D. Y. (2015). Digital Platforms, Imperialism and Political Culture. Routledge. https://routledge.com/9781138097537

Kemp, S. (2025, February 25). Digital 2025: Indonesia. DataReportal. Retrieved February 7, 2026, from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-indonesia

Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2011). Rethinking Critical Theory and Qualitative Research. In K. Hayes et al. (Eds.), Key Works in Critical Pedagogy (pp. 285-326). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-397-6_23

Mariyam, S., Mulyani, S., & Saryana, S. (2025). Corporate Liability of Ride-Hailing Services: An Analysis of Partnership Legal Fiction and the Reconstruction of Passenger Safety Regulation. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 803-820. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.529

Mosco, V. (2009). The Political Economy of Communication (Second Edition). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279946

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (Fourth Edition). SAGE Publications. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/232962

Reed, P., & Haas, W. (2025). Social Media Use as an Impulsive ‘Escape from Freedom’. Psychological Reports, 128(3), 1824-1838. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231171034

Riessman, C. K. (2007). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. SAGE Publications. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/226139

Smythe, D. W. (1977). Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 1(3), 1-27. Retrieved from https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/13715

Tan, Y. N., Alhakim, A., & Nurlaily, N. (2026). Human Rights Protection in the Digital Sphere: The Problematics of Legal Certainty and Its Relevance to the SDGs. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 8(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v8i1.652

Taslaud, G. (2025, November 8). The Real Statistics Behind Influencer Marketing in Indonesia (2025 Analysis). INSG.CO. Retrieved February 7, 2026, from https://insg.co/influencer-marketing-indonesia

Published
2026-07-07
How to Cite
Wattimena, G. H. J. A., Ikhsano, A., & Napitupulu, F. (2026). Voluntary Servitude in Digital Capitalism: A Synthesis of Frommian and Fuchsian Thought on Instagram Influencer Activities. SIGn Journal of Social Science, 7(1), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjss.v7i1.742